Indian cricket needs a major overhaul. The popularity ratings of the game have started to dip and so have the corporate sponsorships. This is a direct reflection of the discontent of the cricketing fans. How long can our cricketers expect the same obscenely high remuneration if they don’t perform? I hope Sharad Pawar becomes the BCCI President. While another politician running Indian cricket is not the greatest thing to happen it is likely to end the monopoly of Jagmohan Dalmiya who has been running Indian cricket like a feudal lord.
There are a few positives, which has emerged out of Ganguly Vs Chappell as well. For starters there is a huge pressure on the captain and coach to do something about the abysmal slump over the last 2 years. Chappell has a huge role to play in how the team approaches India’s campaign to win the World Cup in 2007.While it is high time that Sourav is eased out of the Test team he is very much a part of the scheme of things in the one day set up. Just have a look at his overall one-day record.
Though I have to grudgingly admit that Indian cricket needs a tough professional like Chappell he needs to rethink his approach big time if he wants to win the players trust and confidence. Chappell’s e-mail claims that Ganguly is “ affecting the mental state of other members of the squad”. When he says this is he simply referring to Laxman, who is disenchanted for not being a permanent fixture in the one day set up? I hope Chappell knows that Laxman’s record in the shorter version of the game proves that he is a liability. Chappell also needs to realize that he is not going to win the respect and confidence of the team by reprimanding them to the Board every time he has a problem with one of them, like he had with the skipper.
Sacking Chappell will be a big mistake and if it is a question of Sourav or Chappell I think we might have to sacrifice the Prince of Calcutta in the long-term interest of Indian cricket. I don’t like Greg Chapell as he approaches cricket like a business and I think he has scant respect for the spirit of the game. But when there is huge money involved an out and out professional coach is needed.
I think the current crises –both who will control BCCI and the Ganguly Vs Chappell fallout augers well for Indian cricket. The most important people in Indian cricket-us, the fans are disillusioned with the way our players don’t show the same enthusiasm in playing for India as they do in their corporate promotional campaigns. It’s high time a major revamp in how the game is played and administered takes place. In that context it’s good that both the Board and the team is under the microscope. Its great that this reality check is taking place before we lose another truck load of one-day finals.
Tuesday, September 27, 2005
Reality Check.At Last!
Indian cricket needs a major overhaul. The popularity ratings of the game have started to dip and so have the corporate sponsorships. This is a direct reflection of the discontent of the cricketing fans. How long can our cricketers expect the same obscenely high remuneration if they don’t perform? I hope Sharad Pawar becomes the BCCI President. While another politician running Indian cricket is not the greatest thing to happen it is likely to end the monopoly of Jagmohan Dalmiya who has been running Indian cricket like a feudal lord.
There are a few positives, which has emerged out of Ganguly Vs Chappell as well. For starters there is a huge pressure on the captain and coach to do something about the abysmal slump over the last 2 years. Chappell has a huge role to play in how the team approaches India’s campaign to win the World Cup in 2007.While it is high time that Sourav is eased out of the Test team he is very much a part of the scheme of things in the one day set up. Just have a look at his overall one-day record.
Though I have to grudgingly admit that Indian cricket needs a tough professional like Chappell he needs to rethink his approach big time if he wants to win the players trust and confidence. Chappell’s e-mail claims that Ganguly is “ affecting the mental state of other members of the squad”. When he says this is he simply referring to Laxman, who is disenchanted for not being a permanent fixture in the one day set up? I hope Chappell knows that Laxman’s record in the shorter version of the game proves that he is a liability. Chappell also needs to realize that he is not going to win the respect and confidence of the team by reprimanding them to the Board every time he has a problem with one of them, like he had with the skipper.
Sacking Chappell will be a big mistake and if it is a question of Sourav or Chappell I think we might have to sacrifice the Prince of Calcutta in the long-term interest of Indian cricket. I don’t like Greg Chapell as he approaches cricket like a business and I think he has scant respect for the spirit of the game. But when there is huge money involved an out and out professional coach is needed.
I think the current crises –both who will control BCCI and the Ganguly Vs Chappell fallout augers well for Indian cricket. The most important people in Indian cricket-us, the fans are disillusioned with the way our players don’t show the same enthusiasm in playing for India as they do in their corporate promotional campaigns. It’s high time a major revamp in how the game is played and administered takes place. In that context it’s good that both the Board and the team is under the microscope. Its great that this reality check is taking place before we lose another truck load of one-day finals.
Friday, September 23, 2005
Short Story/The Old Couple And The Touring Marriage Party
Tuesday, September 20, 2005
3 Cases Of Evangelism
Sunday, September 18, 2005
Short Story/The Old Couple And The Touring Marriage Party
Saturday, September 17, 2005
Guest Article/Is There Any Hope For The U.N?
Do we need the United Nations Organisation at all? The UNO was established 60 years ago and by now should have undergone fundamental reforms. But the reforms are failing to go thru, because there is a lack of unity among the nations – and especially there is the ignorance from its most powerful member-state, the USA. But don´t we need an international political instrument against injustice and a counterbalance against economic globalisation?
Histororically, the career of the UN can´t be seen as a straight success-story. Certainly there have also been successes – as during the Cuba-crisis of 1962, when secretary general U Thang prevented the outbreak of an atomic third world war. But often enough, single nations have ignored UN-resolutions. As we all know, in 2003, the United States of America disregarded the UN-decisions and attacked Iraq. Isn´t this a step back undermining the development following 1945?
The USA has always cultivated a love-hate-relationship towards the UN. Inspired by the ideas of the enlightenment era, US-president Woodrow Wilson was probably the keenest founder of the League of Nations in 1919/20. Nevertheless, the USA as a nation never participated in the League ..Although since the foundation of the UN in San Francisco 1945 the UN-headquarters had been located in New York, the love-hate-relationship continued. In the 1980s, President Reagan made sure that the USA left the UNESCO and that fees were not paid completely (one has to admit that the US paid a large share of the UN-household. But if not the most affluent nations – who else should finance supranational politics: Ethiopia or Cambodia?).And the current US-ambassador in the UN, John Bolton, is not more than a bad joke: aid for developing countries, fair trade conditions for the "Third World", protection of the environment, an international criminal court? Not with us!
The hopes of the decolonised countries that had encouraged them to make the UN an arena for their fight for a new (economic) world order in the 1970s were not fulfilled. Now it seems that unilateralism has gained acceptance and that the ideas of the UN – multilateralism and democratic relationships among the nations – have faded away.
So, is there any chance to reform the UN in such a way that it might become a democratic institution with a just balance of power among its member-states? The reform of the Security Council could be a beginning. Just as the League of Nations had been dominated by the winning nations of world war I, the UN is dominated by the winning coalition of world war II. The allies USA, Soviet Union,France and Britain united with China (until 1971 Taiwan)–to become the only permanent members of the Security Council.Today it is the object of the most controversial debates. I think, India should be a permanent member – the voices of 1 billion people must not be ignored by this institution. In the case of Germany, I´m not so sure. Why should there be a third European state? (It would be better to have just one permanent seat for the European Union). And what about Brazil, Japan – and when will the African States take a stronger position in world politics?
Also since the brave ideas of Kofi Annan has not became a reality now (he did not get the support of the USA, because he dared to criticise the war in Iraq) one starts raising these questions.Is there any hope for the UN? And what should be done?
Christian lives in Bohn,Germany and can be contacted at christiansitar@gmail.com
Friday, September 09, 2005
Ten Years Since Mockingbird
Ten years ago, I had just joined The School-K.F.I, the place that has made me what I am today. Being a new student I was desperately trying to fit in to the place where I would go on to meet some of the most important people in my life. It was also the time when I was 1st exposed to serious literature in the form of a book called To Kill A Mockingbird. We did it together in class with Jayshree Akka our English teacher. We would take turns and read the book and then discuss it.
Mockingbird made us wake up to the society around us. It threw up questions for us about things we were unaware of, or had at best a vague and confused knowledge of. For those of you who don’t know the book is about growing up in America in the 30s when there was still open discrimination between blacks and whites. It is about a white lawyer who fights for an Afro-American wrongly accused of raping a white girl. But most unforgettably it is about those two kids-Jem & Scout, and Boo Radley.
Boo is the most enigmatic and haunting character I have come across in literature. This character, not seen until the final pages of the book is made a monster of by the town because of certain rumours. And the way Harper Lee (the author) describes him from the point of view of those kids made us all shudder. There is an incident when the kids are playing and their ball falls into the neighboring Radley house. They are terrified to get the ball fearing that Boo (who incidentally never comes out) will do something awful to them. And Jayshree Akka never once told us until we came to the climax, so to speak, that Boo Radley was such a hero! It was the way we all read this book together which also made it so special. 12-13 years old at that time things like racial discrimination (read caste, in our country’s context), rape, etc were stuff we were blissfully unaware of .Ok, we had seen a few crude rape scenes from a few crude movies, but it was something which we probably did not fully comprehend. But reading through the book and our teacher putting things in perspective, gave some of us our first true insight into the real world. Even a small character like the Finch housemaid was so poignant. And those unforgettable lines after Boo rescues the kids, which Scout narrates in retrospect-
“ Neighbors bring food with death and flowers with sickness and little things in between. Boo was our neighbor. He gave us two soap dolls, a broken watch and chain, a pair of good-luck pennies, and our lives. But neighbors give in return. We never put back into the tree what we took out of it: we had given him nothing, and it made me sad.”
They just make me cry & cry & cry & cry & cry.
Ten years have gone by since we did Mockingbird. Ten years of joy & sorrow; triumphs & disappointments; and inevitably- change. God only know what the next ten will bring. Some of us will be married and settled and all. But one thing I am a certain of –Mockingbird and so many other wonderful things that we shared and indeed still share will always give us comfort and reassurance. For some things are far more eternal than the ravages of time.
Wednesday, September 07, 2005
Idhu Oru Pon Maalaip Pozhudhu
This is the gold hued twilight time of late evening,
The sky blushes as she changes her attire for the night ahead.
A thousand colors weave their magic,
Painting decorative designs at the doorstep of nighttime.
As the sky builds a bridge to the night and the birds sing,
The flower plants sway causing a gentle breeze,
Oh! This lovely gold hued late evening!
To me the sky seems like Buddha’s Bodhi tree*,
Everyday she reassures me with glad tidings,
That one-day we shall live in a fair world,
And that day is not far away,
Through my introspections and questioning,
I do penance and wait for that day,
On this lovely gold hued late evening,
When the sky blushes as she,
Changes her attire for the night ahead.
*The Buddha is said to have attained enlightenment under a Bodhi tree in Bodhgaya.
This is my translation of a poem by the Tamil poet Vairamuthu.It is one of his earliest poems and appeared in the movie Nizhalgal(Shadows).
Monday, September 05, 2005
Lost in Translation?
I am in the middle of Book-4 of Ponniyin Selvan.It has taken me more than a year to reach this far. So many people esp. from my mother’s generation have praised this work so much that, I must admit I am a little disappointed, when I find that it has not lived up to the kind of praise that has been showered on it. But that is because I am reading the translated version, since I don’t know to read Tamil.
To be fair to the translator, C.V.Karthik Narayanan, he has done a decent job. But it is impossible as he himself acknowledges, to capture the grandeur of the original. So many people have described events in the story and how Kalki describes them, and since Tamil is my mother tongue, I can imagine how beautiful it must be to read this work in its original form.
My classmate and friend, Shankar, has been reading the original, after he decided that the translation was not satisfactory. Though his fluency in reading the Tamil script is much lesser than that in reading English, he feels that the effort is worth it. Now I am cursing myself for having taken Hindi instead of Tamil as my second language in school. How captivating it would be to read Kalki’s description of Nandini? How great it would be to see Poonkuzhali, one of my favorite characters, through Kalki’s words?
I am still going to complete reading the book in English. And if it weren’t for the translation I might have never read Ponniyin Selvan.But I feel sad that I cannot read one of the great literary works of the 20th Century in the splendor of its writer's words. It is such a shame that Kalki to this date remains unknown to most readers who are not Tamil. And no translation can ever overcome the language barrier and familiarize non-Tamil’s with Kalki’s books. Because it would make a great work like Ponnyin Selvan seem like a mediocre one. And that’s such a pity.